Review for Educational Oversight: Leyton College, March 2012
Institution:
Leyton College
Attachments:
| Date of review |
Publication date |
Type of review |
Judgements about quality and standards |
Reference |
| Mar-2012 |
22 Jun 2012 |
Review for Educational Oversight |
Confidence in how the provider manages its stated responsibilities for the standards of the awards it offers - What does this mean?
Confidence in how the provider manages its stated responsibilities for the quality and enhancement of the learning opportunities it offers on behalf of its awarding bodies - What does this mean?
Reliance can be placed on the accuracy and completeness of the information that the provider is responsible for publishing about itself and the programmes it delivers. - What does this mean?
|
ISBN 978 1 84979 592 0 |
| Features of good practice |
Recommendations for action |
The team has identified the following good practice:
- gathering and acting upon feedback from students.
|
The team considers that it is advisable for the provider to:
- ensure that the Academic Board complies fully with its terms of reference to maintain rigorous oversight of academic standards and quality on centre-devised programmes
- ensure that both variants of the Postgraduate Diploma in Business Administration comply fully with relevant external reference points
- ensure that staff and students have appropriate access to relevant journals to support teaching and learning
- ensure that website and prospectus information on centre-devised programmes is kept fully up to date.
The team considers that it would be desirable for the provider to:
- undertake a review of quality assurance processes and map them against relevant higher education reference points
- extend the system of regular tutorial review to all students.
|